Return of the Dire Wolf: Science Fiction or Science?

By Joyce A. Shelton, Ph.D.

Their innovative use of genetic technology notwithstanding, Colossal’s  “breakthrough” lacks both scientific and moral credibility.  For starters, they announced their achievement through the popular press accompanied by pictures of cute, fuzzy white “dire wolf” puppies. It delighted sci-fi fans, charmed the general public, and duly impressed their donors. It was received with considerably less enthusiasm, numerous questions, and outright skepticism by the scientific community and other serious thinkers. There has been no published scientific journal article detailing their work, meaning it has not been reviewed and analyzed by scientific peers.  As one scientist, Evelyn Brister put it, “It sounds like the dire wolf is kind of a publicity stunt. Partly because we understand canine genetics well and also because of Game of Thrones.”  Thus, we are left with only their sensationalized claims. These are summarized in a statement on the Colossal Biosciences website, which, on its own, generates some serious concerns:

On October 1, 2024, for the first time in human history, Colossal successfully restored a once-eradicated species through the science of de-extinction. After a 10,000+ year absence, our team is proud to return the dire wolf to its rightful place in the ecosystem. Colossal’s innovations in science, technology and conservation made it possible to accomplish something that’s never been done before: the revival of a species from its longstanding population of zero.

Colossal claims it has “successfully restored a once-eradicated species” (the dire wolf)The problem is that the creatures they produced are not actually dire wolves or even a reasonable facsimile. They are essentially gray wolves with a few edited genes. According to paleontologist, Nic Rawlence, “The gray wolf genome is 2,447,000,000 individual (DNA) bases long. Colossal has said that the gray wolf and dire wolf genomes are 99.5% identical, but that is still 12,235,000 individual differences. So a gray wolf with 20 edits to 14 genes, even if these are key differences, is still very much a gray wolf.”  Their claim is not only highly questionable, but it prompts one to speculate with trepidation where the next steps in such unbounded research might lead. Will a shaggy elephant be designated a restored wooly mammoth? Will a chicken with a funny beak be declared a dodo bird? Will a baboon with a handful of human genes be called… what? These creatures are not resurrected species, they are hybrid monsters made possible through genetic manipulation.  Furthermore, because no one can predict how the inserted genes will interact with others in the genome or with the environmental influences they will encounter, there may yet be unintended consequences. 

What was Colossal’s goal in bringing back the dire wolf?  Their self-congratulatory assertion, “Our team is proud to return the dire wolf to its rightful place in the ecosystem”, is at best perplexing and not practically achievable.  These ancient, large, wolf-like creatures lived during the Ice Age. The prevailing theory is that they died out because they were adapted to eat large prehistoric animals. When rapid environmental changes killed off their prey, they were also eliminated, while the smaller gray wolf survived. The dire wolf’s ecosystem no longer exists. It’s unlikely it can ever be safely or sensibly re-introduced into the present-day environment. Perhaps, as some environmentalists have suggested, for real biological impact, they should concentrate on rescuing endangered species rather than restoring those already long extinct.

Image above: AI-generated image of an influencer taking a selfie with a Dire Wolf — Origin: Adobe Stock